Pilot study: Assessment of the presence of mold in indoor swimming pools
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoor swimming pools are the ideal environment for mold growth as they are intentionally humid and warm. Although there are no established safe exposure levels for airborne mold spores, their presence has been associated with adverse health effects that may put individuals at risk. The objective of this pilot study was to observe the occurrence of airborne mold within indoor swimming pools (n = 6) in the Greater Toronto Area. Viable air samples were taken using a Surface Air System air sampler and cultured to quantify and identify airborne mold using microscopy. In addition, relative humidity and temperature were measured and facility characteristics were recorded. Overall, the mold counts were relatively low and were consistent with the literature. However, a biodiverse fungal profile was found at most sites—some of which included fungal groups linked to harmful health effects in humans. Since this was a pilot study, further research is suggested to determine whether the concentration of mold is a cause for concern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it