MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808958259 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2848466

Approach for Temperature-Sensitivity Enhancement in a Tapered Dual-Core As<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub>-PMMA Fiber With an Antisymmetric Long-Period Grating

2018· article· en· W2808958259 on OpenAlexaff
Song Gao, Chams Baker, Liang Chen, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsMaterials scienceAntisymmetric relationOpticsOptical fiberCore (optical fiber)Sensitivity (control systems)Photonic-crystal fiberFiber Bragg gratingGratingOptoelectronicsLong-period fiber gratingFiber optic sensorPlastic optical fiberElectronic engineeringPhysicsComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and demonstrate an approach for temperature-sensitivity enhancement based on effective group-velocity matching between the even and odd modes of a dual-core As2Se3-PMMA fiber taper on which an antisymmetric long-period grating is inscribed. The transmission of optical pulses in the dual-core As2Se3-PMMA taper inscribes the antisymmetric long-period grating that causes the electric fields to couple back and forth between the even and odd modes leading to effective group-velocity matching between the two modes. The variation of the difference between phases of the two modes φd(λ) with respect to wavelength tends to 0 (∂φd(λ)/∂λ → 0) near the resonance wavelength of the grating due to effective group-velocity matching between the two modes, and consequently, thermally induced change of the difference between phases of the two modes φd(λ) leads to a large wavelength shift indicating enhancement of the temperature measurement sensitivity. Experimental results show that temperature measurement sensitivity in the wavelength range with effective group velocity matching is enhanced by a factor of 4.0 in comparison with the sensitivity in the wavelength range that does not have effective group velocity matching in the dual-core taper with As2Se3core diameter of 1.5 μm. Exploiting sensitivity enhancement within the group-velocity matching wavelength range opens the path toward the realization of novel high-sensitivity fiber sensors for temperature and strain measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207