MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809055720 · doi:10.2337/db18-1184-p

CANadian CAnagliflozin REgistry (CanCARE)—A Prospective, Observational Assessment of Canagliflozin (CANA) Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)—Twelve-Month Results

2018· article· en· W2809055720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vincent Woo, Alan Bell, Maureen Clement, Fernando Camacho, Natasha Georgijev, Jennifer B. Rose, Wally Rapattoni, Harpreet S. Bajaj

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCanagliflozinProspective cohort studyAdverse effectInternal medicineRegimenPolyuriaType 2 Diabetes MellitusSurgeryWeight lossHypoglycemiaDiabetes mellitusObesityEndocrinologyInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CanCARE is a Canadian multicenter, prospective cohort study that enrolled SGLT2 inhibitor-naïve adult patients with T2DM, with A1c ≥7% on a stable anti-hyperglycemic agent (AHA) regimen at baseline and eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2, who were initiated on CANA as part of their usual treatment. This real-world (RW)study assessed the effectiveness and safety outcomes of the enrolled cohort of 527 subjects (mean age 60.7 years, mean baseline A1c 8.3%) over 12 months. Mean A1c reduction was -1.(1.12), with an observed dose response: -0.96 for CANA 100mg, -1.20 for CANA 300mg. 84.9%, 57.9% and 33% of subjects experienced >0%, ≥3%, ≥5% weight loss, respectively. Overall, 38.8% of subjects achieved A1c <7.0%, while 41% achieved the composite endpoint of A1c reduction ≥ 0.5%, body weight loss ≥ 3%. 17.9% subjects discontinued CANA. Safety data showed 37.4% subjects had ≥ 1 Adverse Event (AE), 3.5% had serious AEs, 14.5% had AEs special Interest: genital mycotic infections (9.5%), polyuria (3.7%), UTI (1.5%), severe hypoglycemia (0.9%) and volume-related AE (0.7%). No reports to date of diabetic ketoacidosis or amputation. CANA shows sustained, clinical meaningful improvement in cardiometabolic (CM) parameters in the RW, confirming findings from Phase 3 trials. Table 1: Baseline Values, Results of CM Parameters at 6 and 12 Months After CANA Initiation.Vital of Lab ValueBaseline6 Months12 MonthsChange 6 Months from Baseline mean (std)Change 12 Months from Baseline mean (std)Hemoglobin A1C (%)8.47.47.3-0.90 (1.16)-1.(1.12)Hemoglobin A1C (mmol/mol)68.857.756.2-33.34 (12.68)-35.(12.23)Weight (kg)90.188.589.4-2.87 (4.62)-3.24 (4.81)Body Mass Index (kg/m2)32.131.631.8-1.02 (1.61)-1.15 (1.68)Waist Circumference (cm)107.4104.7105.9-3.11 (9.39)-2.91 (11.12)Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)78.375.375.3-2.90 (8.78)-3.50 (8.68)Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)130.8126.1126.3-4.52 (13.64)-4.65 (13.04)Glomerular Filtration Rate Corrected (mL/min/1.73ml2)85.881.381.4-3.96 (10.72)-5.55 (11.50)Potassium (mmol/L)4.44.54.50.04 (0.37)0.(0.40)HDLCholesterol (mmol/L)1.21.21.20.02 (0.43)0.(0.31)LDLCholesterol (mmol/L)1.91.92.00.01 (0.57)0.01 (0.65)Cholesterol (mmol/L)3.94.03.90.09 (0.76)0.(0.84)Triglycerides (mmol/L)1.91.81.7-0.(0.96)-0.24 (1.17)Triglycerides (mg/dL)172.5162.0151.8-7.53 (85.28)-21.27 (103.27)Albumin/Creatinine (mg/mmol)4.73.54.1-0.28 (5.66)-0.70 (7.96)Albumin/Creatinine (mg/g)41.631.336.3-2.47 (50.11)-6.16 (70.48) Disclosure V.C. Woo: Advisory Panel; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. A.D. Bell: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc.. Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Servier. M.A. Clement: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly and Company. F. Camacho: Consultant; Self; Janssen Inc. N. Georgijev: Employee; Self; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. J.B. Rose: Employee; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. W. Rapattoni: Employee; Self; Janssen Inc, Toronto Canada. H.S. Bajaj: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Abbott. Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Amgen Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG. Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Advisory Panel; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medtronic. Advisory Panel; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Research Support; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Mylan. Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Sanofi. Advisory Panel; Self; Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207