MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809109784 · doi:10.2337/db18-1699-p

Hidden Epidemic—Half of T1DM Is Diagnosed in Adulthood

2018· article· en· W2809109784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maamoun Salam, Yicheng K. Bao, Cynthia Herrick, Janet B. McGill, Jing W. Hughes

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineType 1 diabetesCohortEtiologyPediatricsYoung adultAge of onsetDemographicsDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineDiseaseDemographyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To determine the distribution of age of onset of T1DM in an adult cohort of patients with T1DM. Methods: T1DM patients from an adult academic diabetes center provided informed consent, completed a questionnaire and gave permission for medical record review. Demographics included age, gender and race. T1DM diagnosis was confirmed by history, occurrence of DKA, C-peptide and/or positive T1DM autoantibodies. Patients with diabetes due to pancreatic disease, chemotherapy, genetic syndromes or unclear etiology were not included. Results: Of the 1167 confirmed cases of T1DM, 563 (48.2%) were male and 604 (51.8%) were female; 107 (9.2%) were African-American and 1060 (90.8%) were Caucasian or other (<1% Asian). Mean age of participants was 46.9 +/- 16.2 years. T1DM was diagnosed at ages <1 to 78 years with mean age at onset of 21.3 +/- 14.4 years. Age at onset of <18 years occurred in 576 participants (49.4%), 18-30 years in 313 (26.8%), and >30 years in 278 (23.8%). Males and females age at onset of T1DM ≥18 years were 53.1% and 48.3% respectively, NS (p=0.11). African-Americans and non-African-Americans diagnosed with T1DM at ≥18 years: 52.3% and 50.5% respectively, NS (p=0.71). In a subset of patients with current age ≥30 (n=971), the mean age of onset of T1DM was 23.2+/-14.8 years. Conclusion: In this cohort of adults with T1DM, over half of all patients were diagnosed at age ≥18 years, and 23.8% at age >30 years. This trend was consistent across race and gender and more pronounced in the subset with age ≥30 years. These findings challenge historical data that the mean age of onset of T1DM is in childhood. The strength of this dataset is accuracy of age of onset and diagnosis. The major limitation is that it is not population based. Because the reported age at onset of T1DM is highly dependent on the age of the cohort studied, epidemiologic studies of T1DM should include the entire age spectrum. Better awareness of T1DM in adults is needed to provide appropriate medical management and to ensure patient safety. Disclosure M. Salam: None. Y. Bao: None. C.J. Herrick: Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Cardinal Health. J.B. McGill: Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Aegerion Pharmaceuticals. Consultant; Self; Bayer AG, Dexcom, Inc., Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MannKind Corporation. Research Support; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. J. Hughes: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207