MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809130624 · doi:10.2337/db18-538-p

Plasma Uric Acid (PUA), Renal Hemodynamic Function, and Arterial Stiffness at the Extremes of T1D Duration-Adolescents vs. Adults with T1D for =50 Years

2018· article· en· W2809130624 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuliya Lytvyn, Petter Bjornstad, Julie A. Lovshin, Geneviève Boulet, Mohammed A. Farooqi, Vesta Lai, JOSEPHINE M. TSE, Leslie Cham, Leif Erik Lovblom, Alanna Weisman, Hillary A. Keenan, Michael H. Brent, Narinder Paul, Vera Bril, Andrew Advani, Etienne Sochett, Bruce A. Perkins, David Cherney

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArterial stiffnessInternal medicinePulse wave velocityMedicineAldosteroneCardiologyPlasma renin activityHemodynamicsCohortRenal functionRenin–angiotensin systemEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Higher PUA levels are associated with renal vasoconstriction, renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) activation and vascular stiffness, however the timeline for these associations in T1D is not clear. Our aim was to compare adolescents vs. young adults vs. adults with ≥50 years of T1D from the Canadian Study of Longevity to determine the relationship between PUA and changes in renal hemodynamic function, arterial stiffness and plasma renin and aldosterone over a wide range of diabetes duration. PUA, GFRinulin, ERPFPAH, vascular stiffness parameters (aortic augmentation index [AIx], carotid AIx, carotid femoral pulse wave velocity [cfPWV]), plasma renin and aldosterone were measured during a euglycemic clamp in participants with T1D: 27 adolescents (age 16.8±1.9 years), 52 young adults (25.6±5.5 years) and 66 older adults (65.7±7.5 years). PUA levels were highest in the cohort with the longest T1D duration: 197±44 in adolescents vs. 264±82µmol/L in older adults (p<0.001). While PUA levels did not associate with renal hemodynamic parameters in adolescents or young adults, higher PUA correlated with lower GFR in older adults, even after correcting for age, HbA1c and gender (β=-2.12±0.56, p=0.0003). Higher PUA correlated with lower carotid AIx (β=-1.67±0.58, p=0.02) in adolescents, indicating greater compliance. In contrast, PUA correlated with higher cfPWV (less compliance, p=0.03) and higher plasma renin (p=0.03) in adults with ≥50 years of T1D. The relationship between higher PUA with lower GFR, increased arterial stiffness and RAAS activation was observed only in adults with longstanding T1D. T1D may modify the association between PUA, renal hemodynamic function and RAAS activation, leading to renal vasoconstriction and ischemia. Further work is required to determine whether pharmacological PUA lowering prevents injurious hemodynamic and neurohormonal sequelae of longstanding T1D, thereby improving clinical outcomes. Disclosure Y. Lytvyn: None. P. Bjornstad: Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. J.A. Lovshin: Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Research Support; Self; Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. G. Boulet: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk Inc.. Other Relationship; Self; Janssen Global Services, LLC., Abbott. M. Farooqi: None. V.S. Lai: None. J.M. Tse: None. L. Cham: None. L. Lovblom: None. A. Weisman: None. H.A. Keenan: Research Support; Self; Sanofi. Employee; Self; Sanofi Genzyme. M.H. Brent: Research Support; Self; Novartis Canada. Advisory Panel; Self; Novartis Canada. Research Support; Self; Bayer Canada. Advisory Panel; Self; Bayer Canada, Allergan Canada. Research Support; Self; Roche Canada. N. Paul: None. V. Bril: Consultant; Self; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Support; Self; CSL Behring, Grifols. Advisory Panel; Self; CSL Behring. Consultant; Self; Grifols. Research Support; Self; Shire. Advisory Panel; Self; Pfizer Inc. A. Advani: Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. E.B. Sochett: None. B.A. Perkins: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Abbott. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Abbott, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Insulet Corporation. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Insulet Corporation, Dexcom, Inc. D. Cherney: Consultant; Self; AbbVie Inc.. Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company. Consultant; Self; Sanofi. Other Relationship; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Consultant; Self; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. Other Relationship; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207