Polar domain structural evolution under electric field and temperature in the (Bi <sub>0.5</sub> Na <sub>0.5</sub> )TiO <sub>3</sub> ‐0.06BaTiO <sub>3</sub> piezoceramics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lead‐free bismuth sodium titanate and related compounds are of great interest as promising candidates for piezoelectric applications. However, the full understanding of this family of materials is still a challenge partly because of their structural complexity and different behaviors with or without the application of an external electric field. Here, piezoresponse force microscopy is used to gain insight into the mesoscopic‐scale domain structure of the morphotropic phase boundary ( MPB ) composition of (1‐ x )Bi 0.5 Na 0.5 TiO 3 ‐ x BaTiO 3 solid solution at x = 0.06 (abbreviated as BNT ‐6 BT ). The evolution of the domains with the changes of the electric field and temperature has been thoroughly examined in conjunction with the crystal structure analysis and dielectric studies. It is found that ferroelectric domains with size of hundreds of nanometers are embedded in a relaxor state without visible domains on a mesoscopic scale, which are considered to contribute to the tetragonal and cubic phases in the material, respectively. Temperature‐independent domain configuration is observed in the unpoled sample from room temperature to 200°C. While, temperature‐dependent domain configuration is observed in the poled sample. The homogenously poled state breaks into the mixed domain configuration containing polydomain structure and invisible state around the so‐called depoling temperature. The structural changes on different length scales are also discussed. This work provides an in‐depth understanding of the structural and domain changes under an electric field and the temperature‐dependent domain evolution in both unpoled and poled states in the BNT ‐ BT solid solution of the MPB composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".