Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 21 Years and Younger Using Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: Excellent Survivorship at Five Years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The survivorship of contemporary total hip arthroplasty has improved substantially as a result of the success of highly cross-linked polyethylene. Nevertheless, there is limited information on its performance in extremely young patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the (1) clinical and radiographic outcomes, (2) polyethylene wear rates, and (3) mid-term survivorship of total hip arthroplasty in patients 21 years or younger using highly cross-linked polyethylene. After Institutional Review Board approval, the authors identified 45 patients aged 21 years or younger (56 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with highly cross-linked polyethylene at their institution by the senior author between 2000 and 2009. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years, or until revision. At a mean follow-up of 57 months, modified Harris Hip Scores, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores, Short Form-12 physical function scores, and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores improved significantly in all patients. There was no radiographic evidence of osteolysis in any patient. The mean linear polyethylene wear rate was 0.02 mm per year. Survivorship was 98% with one revision for acetabular loosening at 71 months. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 21 years or younger with highly cross-linked polyethylene had excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Longer-term data are needed in this patient population to confirm continued survivorship in the extremely young. The level of evidence used for this study was level III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".