141 The Effects of Valbenazine on Tardive Dyskinesia: Subgroup Analyses of 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Study Objectives The approval of valbenazine (INGREZZA; VBZ) for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in adults was based on results from double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trials. These studies demonstrated the efficacy of once-daily VBZ based on intent-to-treat analyses. However, because many different types ofpatients can develop TD, subgroup analyses describing treatment outcomes by various patient factors were also conducted. Methods Data were pooled from three 6-week trials: KINECT (NCT01688037), KINECT 2 (NCT01733121), KINECT 3 (NCT02274558), with outcomes analyzed by VBZ dose (80 mg, 40 mg) and PBO. Descriptive analyses conducted using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) total score included: mean change from baseline to Week 6; and AIMS response, defined as 50% improvement from baseline to Week 6. Subgroups were defined as follows: age (<55 years, ≥55 years), sex (male, female), psychiatric diagnosis (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder), CYP2D6 genotype (poor metabolizer [PM], non-PM), body mass index (BMI) (<18.5, 18.5 to <25, 25 to <30, ≥30 kg/m2), concomitant antipsychotic (yes, no); type of antipsychotic (atypical, typical/both); lifetime history of suicidality (yes, no); concomitant anticholinergic (yes, no); TD duration (<7 years, ≥7 years). Results The pooled population included 373 participants (VBZ 80 mg, n=101; VBZ 40 mg, n=114; PBO, n=158). Mean improvements from baseline to Week 6 in AIMS total score were greater overall with VBZ compared to PBO. Within subgroup categories, AIMS score improvement with VBZ 80 mg (recommended dose) was greater in CYP2D6 PMs (n=17; 80 mg, -6.8; 40 mg, 2.4; PBO, 0.5), participants taking no concomitant antipsychotics (n=64; 80 mg, -4.9; 40 mg, -3.0; PBO, 0.0), and overweight participants (BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2, n=115; 80 mg, -4.2; 40 mg, 2.7; PBO, -0.7). Overweight participants also had the highest AIMS response rates at Week 6 (80 mg, 57.7%; 40 mg, 31.6%; PBO, 11.8%), followed by participants taking typical/both antipsychotics (n=67; 80 mg, 57.1%; 40 mg, 20.0%; PBO, 25.0%), and those taking anticholinergics (n=126; 80 mg, 52.9%; 40 mg, 22.7%; PBO, 6.3%). Conclusion These preliminary analyses indicate that TD improvements were generally greater with VBZ than PBO across most subgroups. However, the small sizes of some subgroups may need to be considered when interpreting results. Additional analyses within subgroup categories are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Funding Acknowledgements This study was funded by Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.026 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".