Serial imaging after pulmonary embolism and correlation with functional limitation at 12 months: Results of the ELOPE Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essentials•Exercise Limitation 1 year after an acute pulmonary embolism is common.•Serial imaging after acute pulmonary embolism is not well described and how it affects exercise limitation remains unknown.•1 year after an acute pulmonary embolism chronic changes are common, more so on perfusion lung scanning than CT pulmonary angiography, but imaging findings did not predict exercise limitation.Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchMOP‐93627IntroductionRisk factors for exercise limitation after acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are unknown. As a planned sub‐study of the prospective, multicenter ELOPE (Evaluation of Long‐term Outcomes after PE) Study, we aimed to describe the results of serial imaging by computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and perfusion scan during 1 year after a first episode of acute pulmonary embolism, and to assess the association between imaging parameters and exercise limitation at 1 year.MethodsIn a prospective cohort study, 100 patients were recruited between June 2010 and February 2013 at five Canadian university–affiliated hospitals. CT pulmonary angiography was performed at baseline and 12 months, perfusion scan at 6 and 12 months, and cardio‐pulmonary exercise testing at 1 and 12 months. Imaging parameters included: on CT pulmonary angiography, CT obstruction index (CTO) (% clot burden in the pulmonary vasculature), and on perfusion scan, pulmonary vascular obstruction (PVO) (% perfusion defect). Abnormal cardio‐pulmonary exercise test (primary outcome) was defined as percent of predicted peak oxygen uptake (VO2) <80%.ResultsMean (median; SD) CT obstruction index was 28.1% (27.5%; 18.3%) at baseline, 1.2% (0%; 4.3%) at 12 months. Mean (median; SD) pulmonary vascular obstruction was 6.0% (0%; 9.6%) at 6 months, 5.6% (0%; 9.8%) at 12 months. Eighty‐six patients had exercise testing at 12 months, and 46.5% had VO2 < 80% predicted. Mean (median; SD) CT obstruction index at 1 year was similar in patients with percent‐predicted VO2 peak <80% vs >80% on 1‐year cardio‐pulmonary exercise testing (1.4% [0%; 5.7%] vs 1.0% [0%; 2.4%]; P=.70). Mean (SD) pulmonary vascular obstruction at 6 and at 12 months was similar in patients with percent‐predicted VO2 peak <80% vs >80% (6 months: 5.9% [0%; 10.4%] vs 6.2% [4.5%; 9.0%]; P=.91; 12 months: 5.1% [0%; 10.2%] vs 6.0% [0%; 9.7%]; P=.71).ConclusionsImaging findings after pulmonary embolism did not predict exercise limitation. Residual thrombus does not appear to explain long‐term functional limitation after pulmonary embolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".