MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2809338054 · doi:10.7939/r3sb3xd5j

Cretaceous Bird Fossils of Alberta, Canada

2018· article· en· W2809338054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sydney R. Mohr

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousPaleontologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cretaceous birds of Alberta are poorly understood, as skeletal elements are rare and typically consist of fragmentary postcranial remains. A partial avian coracoid from the upper Campanian Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, Canada can be referred to the Ornithurae, and is referred to here as Ornithurine G. Its structure is similar to previously described ornithurine coracoids from Alberta and other localities in North America, including those belonging to the genus Cimolopteryx. A comparison of these elements indicates that the new coracoid is distinct; however, its preservation prevents complete diagnosis. A pneumatized coracoid is a defining trait of Neornithes, often associated with the presence of a pneumatic foramen. Ornithurine G does not preserve this feature. Also, CT and micro-CT scans of both pneumatic and apneumatic coracoids of modern birds show similar internal structures to Ornithine G, indicating that pneumaticity of the coracoid cannot be determined in the absence of an external pneumatic foramen. A phylogenetic analysis was unable to resolve unclear relationships between Ornithine G, Cimolopterygidae, and neornithine birds, and questions both the assignment of Lamarqueavis to the Cimolopterygidae, and the validity of the family as a whole. Isolated teeth, previously identified as avian, are more common than other avian fossils from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, although none are associated with skeletal material. A variety of specimens ranging from Late Santonian to Late Maastrichtian in age are described in detail and categorized into morphotypes based on qualitative assessment. Numerous characters are shared between birds, non-avian theropods, and crocodilians. In particular, the shape of the crown and surface enamel features of some putative avian teeth strongly resembles those found in the jaws of extant juvenile and some fossil crocodilians. However, whereas quantitative analysis (PCA ordination) was able to separate some putative avian morphotypes from non-avian theropods, and most crocodilian teeth, many of these clusters overlapped. Variation within this sample of teeth may reflect the heterodont dentition of crocodilians, rather than avian species diversity. Reassignment of many putative avian teeth to Crocodylia has important ramifications for the identification of small, isolated teeth, and for interpreting the evolutionary history of Cretaceous birds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta Library→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→