Using Social Media to Change Smoking Behavior: Line Instant Messaging Application Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the influence of anti-smoking multimedia on smoking-cessation behavior with respect to attitude towards smoking, belief in subjective norms of smoking, perceived behavioral control of smoking, intentions to reduce smoking, and motivation for smoking cessation. The study is based on an experimental research. The experimental design consisted of three types of multimedia anti-smoking campaigns (text, text with pictures, and video), and three levels of human caring (environment, surrounding people, and themselves). A total of 90 graduate and undergraduate students participated in the experiment. The findings suggested that participants (1) have unfavorable attitudes towards smoking, (2) are indifferent to belief in subjective norms of smoking, and (3) possess greater perceived behavioral control of smoking after viewing the anti-smoking multimedia campaign for the three levels of human caring. Furthermore, the research found that perceived behavioral control of smoking indirectly influences smoking cessation behavior via intention to reduce smoking. Finally, motivation for smoking cessation directly affects smoking cessation behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".