A rare variant in the sortilin-related receptor 1 gene is associated with declined cognitive functions in the elderly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To estimate the association of rs11218343 in the sortilin-related receptor 1 (SORL1) gene with cognitive performance in the elderly and with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the Russian population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample included 586 elderly people (mean age 70.9±5.7 years) without AD diagnosis and 100 patients with late-onset AD (mean age 72.1±7.8 years) from the Tomsk population. SORL1 rs11218343 was genotyped using PCR and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Cognitive performance in the sample of elderly without AD was assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. RESULTS: Allele frequencies of the SORL1 polymorphism were not significantly different between the elderly without AD and AD patients. However mean MoCA score in the carriers of the rare allele (19.00±6.61) was significantly lower than in homozygotes for the common variant (22.25±3.89) (F=4.97; p=0.026). CONCLUSION: The rare variant in SORL1 gene previously associated with AD in genome-wide association studies and meta-analyses was associated with lower total МоСА scores in the random sample of elderly people that suggests declined cognitive functions in the carriers of this variant in elderly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".