MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809494470 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noy059.715

TBIO-27. GABRIELLA MILLER KIDS FIRST DATA RESOURCE CENTER ADVANCING GENETIC RESEARCH IN CHILDHOOD CANCER AND STRUCTURAL BIRTH DEFECTS THROUGH LARGE SCALE INTEGRATED DATA-DRIVEN DISCOVERY AND CLOUD-BASED PLATFORMS FOR COLLABORATIVE ANALYSIS

2018· article· en· W2809494470 on OpenAlexaff
Allison P. Heath, Pichai Raman, Yuankun Zhu, Jena Lilly, Deanne Taylor, Phillip B. Storm, Angela J. Waanders, Sam Volchenboum, Lincoln Stein, Kyle Ellrott, Brandi N. Davis‐Dusenbery, Robert L. Grossman, Vincent Ferretti, Sabine Mueller, Javad Nazarian, Adam Resnick

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Psychological interventionResource (disambiguation)MedicineEarly childhoodTranslational researchData sciencePsychologyBiologyComputer sciencePathologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood cancers and structural birth share a common context of context in developmental biology that remains poorly defined. Indeed, epidemiologically, pediatric central nervous system tumors are some of the most frequently co-occurring cancers in children with birth defects. While researchers have been increasingly identifying the underlying biological causes of these conditions, the role of genetics and/or shared pathways across cancer and birth defects is not yet fully understood. A better understanding of a common developmental setting could spur advancements in prevention, early detection, and therapeutic interventions that will improve the lives of the children and families impacted by these conditions. The Common Fund’s Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Program represents a national initiative focused on developing a large-scale genomic data supported by a data resource center (DRC) that will empower collaborative discovery and shared resources for research. The DRC will allow researchers everywhere access to vast amounts of childhood cancer and structural birth defects through cloud-based computational and analytics portals including CAVATICA (cavatica.org). Approximately 8,000 patient samples will be ready for analysis at the launch this year including a data cohort of more than 2000 pediatric brain tumor WGS/RNAseq provided by the Children’s Brain Tumor Tissue Consortium (CBTTC) and the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC). More than 25,000 WGS are expected to be processed by 2019, making the Kids First Data Resource Center the largest pediatric data cohort of its kind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207