MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809563034 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2018.2848728

Single-Input Space Vector Based Control System for Ripple Mitigation on Single-Phase Converters<sup>1</sup>

2018· article· en· W2809563034 on OpenAlexaff
Caniggia Viana, Theodore Soong, Peter W. Lehn

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRippleCapacitorFeed forwardTotal harmonic distortionController (irrigation)ConvertersControl theory (sociology)Electrolytic capacitorElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEnergy storagePhotovoltaic systemEngineeringPower (physics)VoltageElectrical engineeringControl engineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applications such as renewable energy generation, electric vehicles, and low-power UPS require single-phase ac/dc conversion. However, this conversion introduces a considerable amount of second-harmonic ripple on the dc link. If not filtered, this distortion hinders the converter's performance as well as the energy quality on both the ac and dc side. To mitigate this problem, a large electrolytic capacitor is usually the solution of choice, which mitigates the voltage ripple, but has drawbacks of its own, including the increased size and cost associated with the large capacitance and the limited lifespan of electrolytic capacitors. Alternative solutions to the problem include integration of an active filter circuit to the converter, which can utilize a storage element with the objective of mitigating power ripple. Such solutions have often been proposed alongside a control system, which is either highly complex or relies on open-loop feedforward techniques. This paper presents a control system, which adapts the single-input space vector concept for a single-phase application and leverages its simplicity and closed-loop architecture, allowing the controller to perform well in the presence of disturbances and parameter uncertainty. Experimental results are provided to elucidate the controller's performance on a single-phase grid-connected photovoltaic array application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207