Diet Choices at 3 and 12 Months for Women and Their Partners after Recent Gestational Diabetes (GDM)—Results of the Families Defeating Diabetes (FDD) Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: FDD was a 12 month, multi-centre, Canadian, randomized study translating diabetes-protective messages after GDM. Male partner participation was encouraged. We compared paternal vs. maternal food choices for interventional (INT) and control (CON) participants before and after FDD. Methods: INT maternal and paternal participants received information promoting high fibre/low fat foods; portion control; healthy restaurant choices via postpartum seminar, access to branded FDD website and twice-monthly email contact. CON maternal subjects received a postpartum healthy living handout. One-day food records at 3 and 12 months were analyzed for fast food intake (FF) and Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) servings. Results: 15 INT and 16 CON maternal/paternal pairs provided food records at 3 and 12 months. Considering INT and CON cohorts together: paternal and maternal grain products, milk/alternatives and meat/alternatives consumption met CFG guidelines at 3 and 12 months. Paternal and maternal vegetables and fruit (V and F) intakes were similar but lower than recommended (paternal: goal 8-10 servings/day; baseline 3.8±2.2; 12 months 4.6±2.9; maternal: goal 7-8 servings/day; baseline 4.1±2.8; 12 months 5.4±3.2). Paternal FF intake was higher than maternal at baseline: (0.41±0.61 vs. 0.12±0.34; p=0.03) but not at 12 months (0.44±0.62 vs. 0.34±0.40, p=0.6). Paternal and maternal V and F intakes were modestly correlated by 12 months (r=0.35, p=0.05). Conclusions: Notable paternal and maternal postpartum diet choices were: servings of V and F did not meet CFG recommendations at 3 and 12 months for men or women; paternal FF intake was higher than maternal soon after delivery, but not at 12 months as maternal servings increased; paternal and maternal V and F intakes were correlated at 12 months postpartum. Therefore, it may be helpful to target both paternal and maternal food choices when promoting healthy living after GDM. Disclosure A. Vezina: None. R.M. McManus: None. L.E. Donovan: None. D.B. Miller: None. I.T. Giroux: None.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".