Commemorating Freedom: The Fortieth Anniversary of the “Fall of Saigon” in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On 30 April 2015, hundreds of Vietnamese Canadians congregated on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, the nation's capital, to commemorate the fortieth anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War and to celebrate the proposed state-sponsored construction of the Memorial to the Victims of Communism. Amidst a sea of Canadian and South Vietnamese flags, former refugees denounced the Vietnamese government for its human rights abuses, focalizing the “problem” of forced migration and refuge(es) on the issue of rights over those of war and geopolitical conflict. This telling scene demonstrates how Vietnamese diasporics remember their histories and negotiate their place within the Canadian national imaginary through the discourse of human rights. It reveals how such rememberings are legitimated and appropriated by the state and how they work to construct a particular understanding of the “good” of refuge. Employing the commemoration event in Ottawa as a site of analysis, this article explores the entanglements of refugee discourse and human rights. The mobilization of human rights by former refugees, as a form of national visibility, necessitates an examination of the ways in which refugees have relied upon the language of rights to make various claims: for asylum, for recognition, for diasporic agency, and for community formation. Human rights, then, do not just form the basis for claiming legal status as “refugees” but also critically function as a force that sustains various collective identities (personal, diasporic, and national) produced in the aftermath of migration and refuge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".