Le dialogue du droit civil et des droits de la personne au Québec : l’exemple de la protection juridique des personnes aînées
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La protection de la personne âgée et vulnérable exige une coopération interdisciplinaire et, sur le plan juridique, elle sollicite différentes branches du droit. Notre étude porte sur l’interaction du droit civil et des droits de la personne en matière de protection des personnes âgées au Québec. Elle concerne plus spécifiquement le caractère autonome mais convergent des garanties qu’offrent à ces personnes la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne et le Code civil du Québec. Nous démontrerons qu’en tant que loi quasi constitutionnelle de protection des droits de la personne, la Charte offre à la personne âgée vulnérable des garanties spécifiques qui excèdent celles prévues par le Code et que, d’autre part, elle oriente l’interprétation de l’ensemble des dispositions du Code civil de façon à protéger les droits des aînés.Protection juridique des aînés – vulnérabilité - exploitation - Charte des droits et libertés de la personne – Code civil du Québec – interprétation des lois – loi quasi constitutionnelle
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".