Single Crystal Growth and Hierarchical Ferroelectric Domain Structure of (1–<i>x</i>)BiFeO<sub>3</sub>-<i>x</i>PbTiO<sub>3</sub> Solid Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Besides outstanding multiferroic performance, BiFeO3 has recently demonstrated a potential for novel promising applications in domain wall nanoelectronics employing domain walls with different functional properties. Rarely observed in ferroelectrics, charged domain walls are of special interest for such applications as they possess enhanced electric conductivity. In this work, single crystals of the multiferroic (1–x)BiFeO3-xPbTiO3 solid solution were successfully grown using a flux method. Structural characterization by X-ray diffraction confirmed perovskite rhombohedral R3c and tetragonal P4mm phases in crystals with x ≈ 0.2 and x ≈ 0.6, respectively. The domain structure of crystals was established with the help of polarized light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and piezoresponse force microscopy. In tetragonal crystals, a complex hierarchical structure of 90° lamella domains is observed with the thickness of lamellae varying from dozens of nanometers to dozens of micrometers. In the rhombohedral composition, twin 109° domains are realized with the domain width of about several micrometers. Besides, the nano- and submicrometer sized rounded 180° domains are embedded randomly among twin domains in both tetragonal and rhombohedral crystals. Mechanical and electrical compatibility conditions are satisfied for all observed 90° and 109° domain walls. However, the 180° walls in tetragonal crystals are proved to be charged. Successful fabrication of high-quality single crystals with the desirable structures of charged and uncharged domain walls can enhance the multiferroic performance and also open a door to explore promising domain boundaries related phenomena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".