Incremental Hash-Bit Learning for Semantic Image Retrieval in Nonstationary Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Images are uploaded to the Internet over time which makes concept drifting and distribution change in semantic classes unavoidable. Current hashing methods being trained using a given static database may not be suitable for nonstationary semantic image retrieval problems. Moreover, directly retraining a whole hash table to update knowledge coming from new arriving image data may not be efficient. Therefore, this paper proposes a new incremental hash-bit learning method. At the arrival of new data, hash bits are selected from both existing and newly trained hash bits by an iterative maximization of a 3-component objective function. This objective function is also used to weight selected hash bits to re-rank retrieved images for better semantic image retrieval results. The three components evaluate a hash bit in three different angles: 1) information preservation; 2) partition balancing; and 3) bit angular difference. The proposed method combines knowledge retained from previously trained hash bits and new semantic knowledge learned from the new data by training new hash bits. In comparison to table-based incremental hashing, the proposed method automatically adjusts the number of bits from old data and new data according to the concept drifting in the given data via the maximization of the objective function. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms existing stationary hashing methods, table-based incremental hashing, and online hashing methods in 15 different simulated nonstationary data environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".