P.034 Supratentorial lateral ventricle hemangioblastoma in Von Hippel Lindau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Supratentorial ventricular hemangioblastoma (HB) associated with Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) are extremely rare. Due to their vascularity and location, their management can be difficult. Methods: A 35 year old female with VHL, has been followed for 25 years with multiple intracranial and spinal tumours. Surgical removal was carried out on one large cystic and solid posterior fossa lesion. In addition, she underwent adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. There were no pancreatic or renal lesions. On serial follow up for years, a left frontal ventricular lesion showed increasing size with clinical signs of increased ICP and marked hydrocephalus, requiring shunting procedures, which were carried out 11 years ago. She has been clinically stable since. Results: Hemangioblastomas of the CNS are rare and account for 2% of primary CNS tumours. Supratentorial location is estimated at 4% for sporadic and 13% for HB associated with VHL. The lateral ventricular location is extremely rare. Review of the literature revealed a total of 9 cases of supratentorial ventricular location. The majority of the lesions are associated with VHL and they are solid and vascular lesions. In our cases there was a cystic component. Conclusions: If removal is contemplated, angiography with possible preoperative embolization may be required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".