Endothelial Cell Loss in Obstetric Forceps-Related Corneal Injury: A Longitudinal Specular Microscopic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of ocular trauma associated with obstetric forceps delivery on the corneal endothelium in children. METHODS: Five patients who attended the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, between 2013 and 2016 with a diagnosis of unilateral obstetrical forceps-related corneal injury were included. Clinical presentation, best-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell density (ECD, cells/mm), and measures of cellular morphology were obtained. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 30 ± 10 months. Mean ECD in the affected eye at initial assessment was significantly lower than that of the fellow eye (2576 ± 733 vs. 3481 ± 288 cells/mm, P = 0.02). At final follow-up, mean ECD was 3293 ± 175 and 1907 ± 524 cells/mm in the normal and affected eyes, respectively (P = 0.004). The mean annual rate of the ECD decrease was higher in the affected eyes than in the normal eyes (9.1% ± 4.2% vs. 2.0% ± 2.5%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In children with forceps-related corneal injury, lower ECD with a higher annual decrease can be assessed with specular microscopy for risk stratification and parental counseling purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".