MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physical Therapy–Based Interventions Improve Balance, Function, Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review

2018· review· en· W2810376202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Brayall, Erin Donlon, Lisa Doyle, Renee Leiby, Katelyn Violette

Bibliographic record

VenueRehabilitation Oncology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathyPsychological interventionPhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)Balance (ability)Physical medicine and rehabilitationPeripheral neuropathyRandomized controlled trialObservational studyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) involves damage to peripheral nerves. It can cause weakness, loss of dexterity, pain, sensory disturbances, and decreased ankle proprioception. These impairments lead to decreased balance, increased risk of falls, difficulty with activities of daily living, and difficulty walking at home and in the community. These functional limitations also contribute to decreased quality of life (QOL) and participation restrictions. There is a lack of evidence related to physical therapy (PT) interventions and outcomes in patients with CIPN. Objective: To systematically review the evidence to determine whether adults with CIPN benefit from PT interventions to improve balance, function, and QOL. Methods: A database search was performed in January 2017 for articles dated in the last 15 years. Search terms used were as follows: chemotherapy, peripheral, neuropathy, prevalence, management, falling, strength, and balance training. This yielded 300 studies, with another 98 studies found through other methods. Inclusion criteria were as follows: adults with diagnosis of CIPN, balance or functional mobility issues due to CIPN, and studies involving PT interventions. Articles were excluded if they were pharmacological intervention based, if they did not include patients with documented CIPN, and if they did not involve PT interventions. Articles were appraised using the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria. A total of 5 articles met the criteria, including 3 experimental studies and 2 randomized control trials, and were included in this review. Results: Lower limb closed kinetic chain exercises showed a decrease in tingling sensation, decrease in pain, and improved balance. Interactive sensor-based balance training showed increasing tandem stance balance with eyes open. Studies involving strength and endurance training showed positive effects for balance, lower extremity strength, function, and QOL, as measured using the McGill QOL Questionnaire and the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Conclusion: PT interventions are beneficial for individuals with CIPN demonstrating improved static and dynamic balance, increased lower extremity strength, and reduction in CIPN symptoms such as pain and paresthesia. This could lead to a decreased risk of falls and has been shown to correlate to an improved QOL. Larger sample sizes, more specific outcome measures and interventions, and better defined inclusion criteria will further inform best practice with this patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.007
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRehabilitation OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207