MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810379231 · doi:10.1111/jsr.12720

Periodic limb movements during sleep are associated with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2018· review· en· W2810379231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sleep Research · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRestless Legs Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioMeta-analysisCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyConfidence intervalPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Periodic limb movements during sleep present with repetitive movements, typically in the lower limbs, during sleep. Periodic limb movements during sleep have been proposed to be associated with increased risk of heart diseases. The aim of this study was to examine the co-morbidity rates of heart disease, including acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease and cardiovascular disease, in subjects with or without periodic limb movements during sleep through a meta-analysis. An electronic review of PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Web of Science, ClinicalKey and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. Clinical studies, case-controlled trials and cohort studies were all included in the search. Case reports or series, and non-clinical studies were excluded. A meta-analysis of the results of six studies comparing the prevalence of coronary artery disease/acute myocardial infarction/cardiovascular disease in subjects with/without periodic limb movements during sleep was performed. There were significantly higher co-morbidity rates of coronary artery disease (odds ratio = 1.568, 95% confidence interval: 1.187-2.073, p = 0.002) and cardiovascular disease (odds ratio = 1.279, 95% confidence interval: 1.095-1.494, p = 0.002), but not acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio = 1.272, 95% confidence interval = 0.942-1.718, p = 0.117), in the periodic limb movements during sleep group than in the non-periodic limb movements during sleep group. This meta-analysis highlights the importance of a significantly high prevalence of coronary artery disease and cardiovascular disease in subjects with periodic limb movements during sleep. Further studies should be focused on the potential pathophysiology, and whether treatment for periodic limb movements during sleep can improve the outcome of heart disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.008
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it