MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810447240 · doi:10.1111/jon.12513

Hemodynamic Changes May Indicate Vessel Wall Injury After Stent Retrieval Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke

2018· article· en· W2810447240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroimaging · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVasospasmBasilar arteryStenosisThrombolysisCardiologyHemodynamicsMiddle cerebral arteryStroke (engine)RadiologyStentOcclusionDigital subtraction angiographySubarachnoid hemorrhageInternal medicineAngiographyIschemiaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stent retrievers have revolutionized endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Animal studies showed that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may cause endothelial injury and intimal layer edema. Using transcranial color-coded duplex-sonography (TCCS) we observed postprocedural hemodynamic changes in the treated vessel. METHODS: We studied AIS patients with large intracranial artery occlusion in whom MT with stent retrievers was performed. Only those with complete recanalization (modified TICI-2b or 3) as assessed by postprocedural digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and in whom early control TCCS was performed were retained. Patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis or stenting were excluded. RESULTS: In 31 patients treated within a time period of 4 years (29 with middle cerebral artery [MCA] and 2 with basilar artery [BA] occlusion), postacute stroke brain-DSA confirmed complete recanalization without residual stenosis or vasospasm. However, in 27 (17 men, mean age 66.3 years) of them TCCS (mean 3.4 days after MT) showed very segmental acceleration of blood flow velocities in the affected arteries (MCA maximum peak systolic velocity [PSVmax] at least >35% as compared to the contralateral side at the same depth; BA PSVmax >40% as compared to velocities at different depths of the same vessel). None showed clinical deterioration. TCCS follow-up (mean 20 days) showed normalization in 14 of 16 cases. CONCLUSION: Our TCCS study provides preliminary evidence of focal acceleration of blood flow velocities after MT. Without residual stenosis or vasospasm, this may be a sign of endothelial layer disruption/intimal injury. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it