P.122 Foramen magnum decompression of Chiari malformation using minimally invasive tubular retractors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: A surgical technique for foramen magnum decompression of Chiari malformation I in 11 patients is described. Methods: We used minimally invasive tubular retractors (METRx Quadrant) attached to a flexible arm to keep the retractor in a fixed position, while allowing flexible angulation under fluoroscopic guidance. Despite the small surgical opening, this approach allowed access to a wide working area, minimized soft tissue exposure, and optimized extent of decompression. For some patients, only the outer layer of dura was opened, but in cases where clinically indicated, a duraplasty was performed. Results: Postoperative CT head demonstrated satisfactory bony removal, and MRI with CSF flow study showed restoration, or significant improvement to CSF flow around the foramen magnum. There was a low incidence of post-operative complications, and the average length of hospital stay was around 1 day (1.2). For 10 out of 11 patients; their symptoms completely resolved on last follow-up, and for those who had syringomyelia, they demonstrated a radiological evidence of syrinx reduction or resolution. Conclusions: Based on our experience with this technique in foramen magnum decompression of Chiari malformation I, minimally invasive tubular retractor is a useful tool, providing the surgeon with enhanced visualization of the operative field, while reducing potential damage to tissue, and optimizing surgical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".