MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810509894 · doi:10.5430/wje.v8n3p149

The Perception of the Educational Philosophy in the Industrial Age 4.0 and the Educational Philosophy Productivity of Teacher Candidates

2018· article· en· W2810509894 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yavuz Bolat, Muhammed Baş

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticePhilosophy of educationTest (biology)PsychologyMathematics educationService (business)PerceptionQualitative propertyPedagogyPhilosophy educationSociologySocial scienceHigher educationComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While philosophy has confronted us as a concept that has taken place in every age of the thinking adventure of thehumankind, philosophical considerations have been influential on all elements of human creation. One of theseinfluence areas is education studies. Education has been influenced by the philosophy of education, which hasoccurred more specifically than philosophy. Educational leaders and pre-service teachers should notice theavailability of using this influence and the educational philosophy as a tool. This research was conducted in order todetermine the perception of educational philosophy in the industrial age 4.0 and to find the educational philosophyproductivity of pre-service teachers. The study group includes 111 pre-service teachers who take the trainingphilosophy course in the 2nd class level in the Faculty of Education of Mustafa Kemal University in Turkey. 72 ofthese pre-service teachers are female, and 39 are male. This research where quantitative and qualitative data are usedtogether is a mixed educational research. In the study, a 25-question test developed by the researcher and asemi-structured interview form consisting of 3 questions has been used to collect data. While the pre-test andpost-test studies were conducted with the test which is the data collection tool, the data were analyzed by using thedescriptive analysis and the content analysis of the data obtained from the interview form. When the findings of thestudy were taken into consideration, it was found that there was a significant difference between pre-test scores andpost-test scores of the pre-service teachers participating in the research. The teaching process of the trainingphilosophy course given has been found to be successful. It has been concluded that pre-service teachers haveexpressed the philosophy and education relationship with human-based views. It has been found that pre-serviceteachers prefer the "progressive training philosophy" if they want to make a new educational design. However, it hasbeen determined that pre-service teachers did not have an idea about technology and technological developments inthe industrial age 4.0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207