P.011 Not just for babies: positive rolandic sharp waves in adult post-hypoxic myoclonus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Post-hypoxic myoclonus is broadly divided into myoclonic status epilepticus (MSE) and Lance-Adams syndrome (LAS), where diagnosis depends on clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) findings. Positive rolandic sharp waves (PRS) are a classic EEG finding in pre-term infants with white matter necrosis, but they are not known to be epileptogenic and have never been described in adults. Methods: We report a unique case of PRS correlated with myoclonic seizures in a post-hypoxic adult patient. Results: Shortly after cardiac arrest, a 21-year-old woman developed multifocal post-hypoxic myoclonus. Early development of myoclonus suggested MSE, but her EEG findings were atypical for MSE; initially, the only notable feature on EEG were subtle PRS. LAS did not fit the clinical picture or EEG findings. As myoclonus persisted over the following weeks, PRS evolved on EEG into positive rolandic predominant generalized polyspike-wave complexes that became definitively time-locked to each myoclonic jerk. PRS were diagnosed as epileptogenic and frequent myoclonic jerks were diagnosed as continuous myoclonic seizure. Myoclonus resolved to medication and mental status returned to baseline. Conclusions: We report for the first time that PRS can appear in adult patients and be epileptogenic, and produce a non-classical variant of post-hypoxic myoclonus that carries good prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".