On the Lived, Imagined Body: A Phenomenological Praxis of a Somatic Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"On the Lived, Imagined Body" is a reflective remembering from the point of view of a movementperformance artist's training session learning to dance with imagined wings when in her livedexperience, the body of the dancer is aware somatically of moving with wings that do not actuallyexist. The overarching conceptualization in this article describes the inner-outer tensions, thekinesthetic, somatic, proprioceptive penetration inward and the visual-kinetic, imaginative reachoutward. The landmark work from dance phenomenologist Maxine Sheets-Johnstone (1966/2015),The Phenomenology of Dance, prompted the author of this article to translate an embodiedexperiential and imagined event for readers who might never have had the experience of a somaticmovement training of dancing with imagined wings as a lived experience. The phenomenology ofdancing as if with lived and imagined wings is developed further as a result of two week-longpresencing workshops taught by contemporary dancer-choreographer and somatics teacher BenoîtLachambre (2015/2016). For movement artists and dance practitioners, experiencing imaginarywings as lived wings means experiencing movement through mindful awareness and consciousintention of a praxis of somatic architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".