Tacto y Enseñanza: manifestaciones y significado de la sensibilidad pedagógica a través de casos prácticos en el aula
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl concepto de tacto pedagogico parte de las aportaciones de Van Manen (1998), autor de origen holandes y catedratico de Pedagogia en la Universidad de Alberta (Canada), nos presenta una version alejada de las descripciones tradicionales y enfoques pedagogicos meramente instrumentales que refieren a las interacciones educando-educador. Aunque desde el conocimiento de los enfoques psicopedagogicos basados en habilidades, dimensiones y estudios de la Didactica, Psicologia y Pedagogia nos describe una vision fenomenologica y practica de la ensenanza entendida como una actividad pedagogica reflexiva, para desde esta definirla como la forma en que los educadores maduran, evolucionan y profundizan como consecuencia del hecho de convivir con los ninos en un centro escolar o en cualquier aula. Esta revision bibliografica tiene como objetivo principal presentar al lector dedicado a la ensenanza de ninos y jovenes una posibilidad de reflexion en su practica docente desde la propia identidad de las relaciones interpersonales: vocacion, intuicion moral, sentido del tacto hacia la subjetividad del nino, prudencia, preocupacion, afecto, y un profundo sentido de la responsabilidad en la educacion de las nuevas generaciones, y que por otro lado, son cualidades esenciales para el ejercicio de una buena docencia. EnglishThe concept of pedagogical tact is based on the contributions of Van Manen (1998). This author of Dutch origin, Professor of Pedagogy at the University of Alberta (Canada) presents a version of traditional descriptions and purely instrumental pedagogical approaches that refer to educator-educator interactions. Although from the knowledge of psycho-pedagogical approaches based on skills, dimensions and studies of Psychology and Pedagogy describes a phenomenological and practical vision of teaching understood as a reflexive pedagogical activity, to define it as the way in which educators mature, evolve and deepen as a result of the fact of living with the children in a school or in any classroom. This bibliographic review has as main objective to present the reader dedicated to the teaching of children and young people a possibility of reflection in their teaching practice from the very identity of interpersonal relationships: vocation, moral intuition, sense of touch towards the subjectivity of the child, prudence, concern, affection, and a deep sense of responsibility in the education of the new generations, and on the other hand, are essential qualities for the exercise of a good teaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".