Abstract 019: Effect of CPAP on Blood Pressure and Central Sympathetic Outflow in Diabetic Patients with OSA, Resistant HTN, and CKD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Central sympathetic hyperactivity as assessed by muscle sympathetic nerve activity recordings is thought to play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of hypertension (HTN) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Decreases in daytime and nocturnal blood pressure (BP) in response to treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are paralleled by decreases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have high MSNA. Bilateral nephrectomy, but not renal transplantation normalizes MSNA indicating central sympathoexcitatory effects by renal afferents. The objective of this study was to assess to what extent is HTN driven by central sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with diabetic CKD, OSA, and resistant HTN. Thirteen patients (age 62.2±7.4 years) with diabetic CKD, resistant HTN defined as SBP on 24-hr ABPM above 135 mmHg while on 3 or more BP lowering drugs (including diuretic) with OSA, were randomized to therapeutic CPAP or non-therapeutic CPAP for one months. 24-hr ABPM, plasma catecholamines, aldosterone, and renin, and MSNA were assessed before and 1 months after randomization. Our results show (Table) that in contrast to sham CPAP, therapeutic CPAP decreased daytime and nighttime BP. In contrast, neither therapeutic nor sham CPAP caused any changes in MSNA and plasma catecholamines. In conclusion, decreases in BP in response to CPAP in patients with in diabetic CKD, despite maintained high MSNA, indicate other mechanism contributing to HTN in these patients as well as other central sympathoexcitatory pathways activated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".