La relación entre las opiniones acerca de la docencia universitaria y la función tutorial del profesor en la universidad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN Esta investigación pretende indagar en la opinión que tienen las estudiantes de 4° año de la carrera de Educación Diferencial, en cuanto al desempeño profesional de la investigadora en diferentes ámbitos de la docencia, tales como la organización y estructura de la asignatura, es decir, si se evidencia suficiente dominio teórico y conceptual del tema que se desarrolla en la programación; si presenta una actitud mediadora para generar los propios aprendizajes de los estudiantes. Complementario a lo anterior, indagar si las estrategias de enseñanza son pertinentes a los aprendizajes esperados. Por último, saber si los procedimientos evaluativos son pertinentes y se enfocan a los aprendizajes que han alcanzado los estudiantes, y cuál es la percepción en torno a la interacción y clima que se genera dentro de las propias clases, y más allá del aula. Todo esto, con la finalidad de relacionarlo con prácticas pedagógicas innovadoras, como lo es la función tutorial del docente universitario, detectando aquellos puntos valorados y los no tan valorados para proyectar mejoras en aquellos aspectos que así lo requieran.Palabras clave: Competencias docentes, organización curricular, estrategias de enseñanza, procedimientos de evaluación.Relationship between opinions about University teaching and the mentoring role of the University teacher ABSTRACT This research aims to researching opinions that Fourth-year students of Special Education have regarding to the professional performance of the researcher in different teaching fields such as organization and structure of a course, that is to say, whether there is evident sufficient theoretical and conceptual mastery of the subject, whether there is a mediating attitude to generate learning in students. Complementary to that, the paper is aimed to reviewing whether teaching strategies are relevant to the learning objectives. Finally, it seeks to know whether the evaluation procedures are relevant and focused on learning students have achieved, and what would be the perception around interactions and climates generated in the classroom and beyond. The objective is to create a relationship with innovative teaching practices, as the mentoring role of the University teacher, unveiling valued and not valued aspects in order to project improvements in those weak areas.Keywords: Teaching skills, curricular organization, teaching strategies, evaluation procedures and interactions between teacher and student.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".