El análisis comparativo de la aplicación del sistema dual de aprendizaje en Universidades en Canadá con respecto al Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Puerto Vallarta para el desarrollo de habilidades de competitividad
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl mundo actual requiere a profesionistas competitivos, para lo cual las Universidades disenan programas academicos pertinentes con practicas en empresas del area geografica donde se desarrollan. Con la finalidad de que los alumnos adquieran las competencias requeridas en el ambito laboral. En el presente trabajo se realiza un analisis comparativo de la forma de aplicacion del sistema dual de aprendizaje, sistema que tiene sus origenes en Alemania en el cual los alumnos realizan practicas en empresas de la region de su perfil profesional disenadas, previstas y reguladas por la institucion academica; dicho analisis se realiza con las caracteristicas de aplicacion del sistema en cuatro universidades de Canada con respecto al Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Puerto Vallarta aplicado en prueba piloto, destacando las fortalezas y debilidades para determinar las areas de oportunidad en el Instituto para orientar propuestas de aplicacion tomando en consideracion a Canada como modelo debido que ocupa los primeros lugares de competitividad a nivel mundial . EnglishIn order for students to acquire the skills required in the workplace. The present work is a further investigation in which a comparative analysis of the application form dual apprenticeship system, a system that has its origins in Germany in which students complete internships at companies in the region designed professional profile, planned and regulated by the academic institution. This analysis is performed with the application characteristics of the system in five Canadian universities vs. Higher Technological Institute of Puerto Vallarta, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses to determine areas of opportunity in the Institute to guide implementation proposals considering Canada as a model because it occupies the top of global competitiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it