MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810936242

El análisis comparativo de la aplicación del sistema dual de aprendizaje en Universidades en Canadá con respecto al Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Puerto Vallarta para el desarrollo de habilidades de competitividad

2014· article· es· W2810936242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alejandra Medina Lozano, Leticia Velarde Peña

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Internacional de Tecnologías en la Educación · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Science Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceInternshipGeographyCartographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolEl mundo actual requiere a profesionistas competitivos, para lo cual las Universidades disenan programas academicos pertinentes con practicas en empresas del area geografica donde se desarrollan. Con la finalidad de que los alumnos adquieran las competencias requeridas en el ambito laboral. En el presente trabajo se realiza un analisis comparativo de la forma de aplicacion del sistema dual de aprendizaje, sistema que tiene sus origenes en Alemania en el cual los alumnos realizan practicas en empresas de la region de su perfil profesional disenadas, previstas y reguladas por la institucion academica; dicho analisis se realiza con las caracteristicas de aplicacion del sistema en cuatro universidades de Canada con respecto al Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Puerto Vallarta aplicado en prueba piloto, destacando las fortalezas y debilidades para determinar las areas de oportunidad en el Instituto para orientar propuestas de aplicacion tomando en consideracion a Canada como modelo debido que ocupa los primeros lugares de competitividad a nivel mundial . EnglishIn order for students to acquire the skills required in the workplace. The present work is a further investigation in which a comparative analysis of the application form dual apprenticeship system, a system that has its origins in Germany in which students complete internships at companies in the region designed professional profile, planned and regulated by the academic institution. This analysis is performed with the application characteristics of the system in five Canadian universities vs. Higher Technological Institute of Puerto Vallarta, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses to determine areas of opportunity in the Institute to guide implementation proposals considering Canada as a model because it occupies the top of global competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Internacional de Tecnologías en la EducaciónSame topicEducational Research and Science TeachingFrench-language works237,207