Biovalorization of glucose in four culture media and effect of the nitrogen source on fermentative alcohols production by <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucose is one of the most abundant monosaccharides and the easiest carbon source to be consumed by bacteria. In this study, four culture media (LB, M9, M63 and MOPS) were supplemented with glucose at three different concentrations (4, 12.5 and 25 g/L) in the presence of a genetically modified strain of Escherichia coli with the purpose of selecting the most suitable culture medium to obtain ABD (acetoin (A) and 2,3-butanediol (2,3-BD)). The selected medium was M9, the cheapest culture medium, since the ABD yields obtained fermenting 12.5 and 25 g/L of glucose in M9 culture medium at 37°C, atmospheric pressure, initial pH 6.5, 100 rpm and 10% (v/v) of inoculum were similar compared to the ABD yields obtained using M63 and LB culture media. The influence of nitrogen on ABD yield was tested adding sodium nitrate (NaNO3) or urea ((NH2)2CO) to M9 culture medium at three different nitrogen concentrations (2.5, 5.0 and 7.0 g N/L). Adding urea (7.0 g N/L) to M9 supplemented with 25 g/L of glucose improved by 23% the ABD yield at 96 h compared to M9 without urea, reaching a value of 27.2% (g ABD/g glucose). In contrast, the use of NaNO3 had no significant effect on the ABD yield.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".