Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bodies affected by Agent Orange trouble judicial and psychic notions of “reparation” as they become the sight/site of repair on behalf of national body politics. The simultaneous public display and quarantined seclusion of bodies affected by the herbicide point toward the ambivalent role of disabled bodies in Vietnam. In my discussion, I analyze how the surgical separation of conjoined twins Việt and Đức Nguyễn came to represent an act of reparation that meant to rhetorically unite Japan and Vietnam against the United States. Through analyses of a book titled Cheer Up Viet and Duc and a music video collaboration between Vietnamese and Japanese pop musicians, I discuss how attempts to “heal” disability conflate non-normative bodies with wartime trauma, thereby reproducing a eugenic narrative that seeks to eradicate disability as a demonstration of neo-liberal modern progress. Against these dominant narratives of repair, I suggest that the transnational circulation of Agent Orange creates networks that are dependent upon recognizing a shared, and differentially distributed, vulnerability to contamination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".