MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811211257 · doi:10.1038/s41395-018-0176-7

Continuous Anti-TNFα Use Throughout Pregnancy: Possible Complications For the Mother But Not for the Fetus. A Retrospective Cohort on the French National Health Insurance Database (EVASION)

2018· article· en· W2811211257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal General Hospital
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMedicineAdalimumabInfliximabCertolizumab pegolPregnancyInflammatory bowel diseaseRetrospective cohort studyCohortGolimumabEtanerceptUlcerative colitisDiseaseObstetricsPediatricsInternal medicineTumor necrosis factor alpha

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) need long-term treatment, which can influence pregnancies in young women. Uncontrolled IBD is associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Despite the labeling of Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies (anti-TNFα) which indicates that their use is not recommended during pregnancy, anti-TNFα are increasingly being used during pregnancy and may expose women and their fetuses to treatment-related complications. Existing recommendations on the timing of treatment during pregnancy are inconsistent. We aimed to assess the safety of anti-TNFα treatment in pregnant women with IBD, and up to the first year of life for their children. METHODS: An exposed/non exposed retrospective cohort was conducted on the French national health system database SNIIRAM (Système National d'Information Inter-Régimes de l'Assurance Maladie). All IBD women who became pregnant between 2011 and 2014 were included. Women with concomitant diseases potentially treated with anti-TNFα were excluded. Anti-TNFα exposure (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab or certolizumab pegol) during pregnancy was retrieved from the exhaustive prescription database in SNIIRAM. The main judgment criterion was a composite outcome of disease-, treatment- and pregnancy-related complications during pregnancy for the mother, and infections during the first year of life for children. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 11,275 pregnancies (8726 women with IBD), among which 1457 (12.9%) pregnancies were exposed to anti-TNFα, mainly infliximab or adalimumab, with 1313/7722 (17.0%) suffering from Crohn's disease and 144/3553 (4.1%) from ulcerative colitis. After adjusting for disease severity, steroid use, age, IBD type, and duration and concomitant 6-mercaptopurine use, anti-TNFα treatment was associated with a higher risk of overall maternal complications (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-1.67) and infections (aOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.16-1.47). Maintaining anti-TNFα after 24 weeks did not increase the risk of maternal complication, but interrupting the anti-TNFα increased relapse risk. No increased risk for infection was found in children (aOR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.76-1.05) born to mother exposed to anti-TNFα during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNFα treatment during pregnancy increased the risk of maternal complications compared to unexposed; however, discontinuation before week 24 increased the risk of disease flare. There was no increased risk for children exposed to anti-TNFα up to 1 year of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it