MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811246604 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00173

Knowledge, Attitude, Awareness, and Barriers Toward Influenza Vaccination Among Medical Doctors at Tertiary Care Health Settings in Peshawar, Pakistan–A Cross-Sectional Study

2018· article· en· W2811246604 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Iftikhar Ali, Muhammad Ijaz, Inayat Ur Rehman, Afaq Rahim, Humera Ata

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Infection and ImmunityCardiff University
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationFamily medicineCross-sectional studyInfluenza vaccineImmunizationHealth careTertiary careImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude and awareness of medical doctors towards influenza vaccination and the reasons for not getting vaccinated. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out among medical doctors in three major tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan. A web-based, pre-tested questionnaire was used for data collection. Results: A total of (n=300) medical doctors were invited, however only (n=215) participated in the study with a response rate of 71.7%. Among the participants, 95.3% (n=205) were males with a mean age of 28.67±3.89 years. By designation, 121(56.3%) were trainee medical officers and 40 (18.6%) were house officers. The majority had a job experience of 1-2 years (n=102, 60.6%). Of the total sample, 38 (17.7%) doctors reported having received some kind of vaccination, whereas only 19 (8.84%) were vaccinated against influenza. The results identified that the major barriers towards influenza vaccinations included (1) a general perception among the health-care professionals that influenza is not a serious condition and therefore not worth vaccinating against (relative importance index RII=0.775), (2) the non-compulsory requirement for vaccination (RII=0.756), (3) fear of needles (RII=0.713) and (4) the associated side-effects or safety concerns (RII=0.681). Additionally, 156(72.6%) of doctors were not aware of the influenza immunization guidelines published by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and Centre for Disease Control (CDC). Physicians obtained a high score (8.27 ± 1.61) of knowledge and understanding regarding influenza and its vaccination followed by medical officers (8.06 ±1.37). Regression analysis revealed that gender was significantly associated with the knowledge score with males having a higher score (8.0+1.39) than females (6.80+1.61). Conclusion: A very low proportion of doctors were vaccinated against influenza, despite the published guidelines and recommendations. Strategies that address multiple aspects like increasing awareness and the importance of the influenza vaccine, the international recommendations and enhancing access and availability of the vaccine are needed to improve its coverage and health outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207