P.118 Trigemino-cardiac reflex: a case report of intra-operative asystole in response to manipulation of the temporalis muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The trigemino-cardiac reflex (TCR) is a sudden onset of bradycardia, hypotension, apnea or gastric hypermotility during stimulation of the trigeminal nerve. Methods: We conducted a MEDLINE search for surgical cases of TCR and herein describe a case seen recently at our institution. Results: A 60 year-old female underwent a left orbitozygomatic craniotomy for resection of a skull-base tumor. Pre-operative anesthesia evaluation was unremarkable and negative for a history of cardiovascular disease. Intra-operatively, retraction with moderate force of the temporalis muscle consistently produced asystole. Cessation of retraction resulted in immediate return of sinus rhythm. Otherwise, intra-operative heart rate was 60-90 BPM. Post-operatively, vital signs and clinical course were unremarkable. The patient experienced a similar phenomenon during an operation 6 years earlier, when manipulation of tumor near cranial nerves IX/X resulted in bradycardia. TCR is the result of a polysynaptic brainstem network involving the afferent trigeminal sensory nucleus, the reticular formation, and the efferent vagal motor nucleus. Conclusions: This is a case of exaggerated vagal response following manipulation of the temporalis muscle. Our report emphasizes the importance for neurosurgeons and anesthesiologists alike to be wary of TCR in order to avoid deleterious consequences when operating on structures associated with the trigeminal nerve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".