A Comprehensive Healthy Lifestyle Program for Children Receiving Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of a comprehensive healthy lifestyle program for children receiving treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A sample of 13 eligible children in the maintenance phase of treatment, ages 4-8, 10 male, enrolled in the study. A tailored lifestyle program involving a series of monthly, individual education sessions was provided for parents and children by an oncologist, physical therapist, dietitian, and behavioural psychologist. Content focused on participation in physical activity, healthy eating habits, and behavioural strategies. A number of pre- and postmeasures addressed a variety of body functions and activities. Delivery of the program and collection of most measurement data were feasible. Parents valued the program and preliminary data analyses showed individual variation and group improvements in ankle range of motion, exercise capacity, gross motor function, mobility, and physical activity as well as maintenance of dietary practices, body mass index, sports participation, and quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it