MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W281216291

Combined In Situ Micro X-Ray Diffraction and Raman Study of Carbonaceous Matter in Ureilites and Terrestrial Materials

2008· article· en· W281216291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLPI · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyCrystalliteMaterials scienceGraphiteDiffractionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)X-ray crystallographyDiffractometerOpticsMineralogyCrystallographyChemistryCrystal structurePhysicsComposite materialMetallurgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: It has recently become possible to undertake in situ non destructive microanalytical studies of meteorites and other precious materials. Flemming [1] outlines the recent developments made in expanding the applicability of micro X-ray diffraction (μXRD) for use with Earth and planetary materials. Here we report a reconnaissance study using the complimentary techniques of in situ μXRD and Raman spectroscopy to examine carbonaceous material in two ureilite samples (Dar al Gani 976 and Dar al Gani 1023) and four terrestrial samples (impact suevites from Kara and Gardnos and carbonrich veins from Torr Mor and the Ereland volcanic complex). The μXRD analysis was conducted at the University of Western Ontario using the Bruker-AXS D8 Discover diffractometer, with a 50 μm beam in which diffracted rays are collected using a two dimensional general area diffraction detector system (GADDS), recording textural and crystal structural information. Raman microspectroscopy was carried out at the University of Aberdeen with the 514.5 nm Ar ion laser beam of a Renishaw inVia Reflex Spectrometer, using a smaller spot size (typically 1-2 μm) to characterise the carbonaceous material and to provide a proxy for the degree of structural order. Results: There is generally good agreement between the μXRD and Raman data, although crystalline graphite seems to be more readily identified using μXRD (Table 1). Graphite is anisotropic and there may be an orientation effect such that crystalline graphite will only be detected when the Raman laser is perpendicular to the stacked crystallite. The larger beam size used in μXRD means that there is potentially some overlap between phases and some patterns may be ambiguous (e.g. chaoite). Using a second technique such as Raman microspectroscopy to examine the phases identified by μXRD provides confirmation and additional information. The μXRD configuration includes an integrated optical microscope and digital camera system with a HeNe targeting laser. The laser, microscope optics and X-ray beam are aligned such that when the laser is in optical focus, the point on the sample illuminated by the laser is at the centre of diffraction. Image maps can be created prior to analysis and then be used for subsequent Raman imaging and spectroscopy. Fig. 1 shows μXRD data for one location on the Kara suevite sample. Fig. 2 shows Raman spectra for the same sample, corroborating the presence of amorphous carbon. Figure 1. Montage of Kara μXRD data showing the two dimensional record of diffracted X-rays (top), the integrated diffraction pattern (bottom) and microscope image centered on the spot location (inset). The top image shows “powder rings” indicative of a phase with crystallites in every random orientation, with 2-theta increasing from the left. The raw integrated diffraction pattern (in grey) shows a very broad, diffuse signal from ~12o-25o which is interpreted as amorphous carbon. The background subtracted pattern is shown in black and is overlain with the integrated 1D diffraction pattern. Matching peak locations for graphite are indicated in red, quartz in blue and aragonite in magenta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it