MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W281400309 · doi:10.5006/c2000-00126

Identification and Characterization of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Involved in Microbially Influenced Corrosion in Oil Fields

2000· article· en· W281400309 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mehdi Nemati, Gerrit Voordouw

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionSulfate-reducing bacteriaIdentification (biology)SulfateCharacterization (materials science)Environmental chemistryBacteriaMetallurgyMaterials scienceChemistryGeologyNanotechnologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are thought to be involved in microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) of oil field pipelines and equipment. Analysis of microbial communities on corrosion coupons installed in production facilities at Wainwright and Wildmere, two oil fields in Alberta, was done by reverse sample genome probing (RSGP) a DNA hybridization assay in which multiple bacteria can be tracked simultaneously. RSGP indicated dominance of SRB in the microbial communities present on 10 of 15 coupon samples. Of these Desulfovibrio spp. Lac6 and Eth3 were found to be resistant to cocodiamine biocides used in these fields, suggesting that biocide addition could be of limited use for corrosion prevention. Desulfovibrio sp. Lac6 was inhibited by nitrite, and by nitrate if a nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacterium was also added. Addition of nitrite or nitrate thus offer alternative ways to contain SRB, although their effect on corrosion rates have not been extensively studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207