MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2814412793 · doi:10.1109/cibcb.2018.8404972

Drug target interaction predictions using PU- Leaming under different experimental setting for four formulations namely known drug target pair prediction, drug prediction, target prediction and unknown drug target pair prediction

2018· article· en· W2814412793 on OpenAlexaff
Hetal Rahul Rajpura, Alioune Ngom

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrugDrug targetArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMachine learningPharmacologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting new drug target interactions experimentally through wet lab experiments is time as well as resource intensive. In general, drug-target interaction prediction problem leads to drug discovery, drug repositioning and uncovers interesting patterns in chemogenomics research. Drug and target represent heterogeneous nodes within a network of interactions. Presence of an edge between the nodes indicates a positive interaction whereas an absence suggests an unknown interaction. Classification based machine learning algorithms are heavily applied in this area of research. Classification algorithms need positive as well as negative data to yield optimized results. The major problem in this field is lack of negative data because the data that are found in the public databases are positive interaction samples. Considering unknown drug target pairs as negative data may cause severe consequences for the prediction performance. Thereby, we propose a positive un-labelled (PU) learning- based approach that uses one class support vector machine technique as the learning algorithm. The algorithm learns the positive distribution from the unified feature vector space of drugs and targets and regards unknown pairs as unlabeled instead of labelling them as negative pairs. Additionally, we use 4860 Klekota Roth fingerprint + 881 PubChem fingerprint as a high dimensional and highly discriminative feature vector representation for drugs. To represent protein features, we create a protein-motif matrix based on the sliding window score that records the probability of a motif pattern occurring within a given protein sequence. Also, we separately evaluate the prediction performance using 5-fold nested cross- validation under different experimental setting for each of the four formulations: 1) Known drug-target pair,2) Drug prediction, 3) Target prediction and 4) Unknown drug target pair. We show that our approach yields the best AUC score over previous benchmark techniques and outperforms most of the recent works based on one class classifiers and PU-based learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207