MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2817086536 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxy092

Neonatal abstinence syndrome – a better way

2018· article· en· W2817086536 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Thiessen

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbstinenceMedicinePsychiatryIntensive care medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The excellent practice point published in the June 2018 issue of Paediatrics & Child Health strongly advocates that rooming in with mother should become the normative way to manage infants at risk of neonatal abstinence syndrome. This stands in sharp contrast to the ‘usual’ pattern of practice where infants exhibiting signs of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) are transferred to an neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or ‘observational nursery’, as occurs in approximately 90% of Canadian hospitals as revealed by a national survey of practice published in 2017 (1). In Vancouver, we have been employing a ‘rooming in’ model of care at BC Women’s Hospital since 2001, when we dedicated an entire postpartum ward for the care of mothers and infants with opiate exposure at risk of NAS. NICU or intermediate nursery admission only happens if there are medical problems requiring other interventions such as respiratory support, NG feeding or IV antibiotics. We have demonstrated convincingly that this model significantly reduces the proportion of infants needing treatment with morphine, reduces the number of days they need treatment AND significantly increases the odds of breastfeeding and discharge in the custody of their mother (2,3). Our rooming in model of care has never employed the Finnegan numerical scoring system in the original or modified form, as we were very concerned that it would lead to over treatment. We opted instead for a variation of the ‘Eat/Sleep/Console’ model of observation espoused by Grossman et al. in their recently published article (4), which convincingly shows that use of the Finnegan scoring system leads to over treatment. The ideal model of care for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome is still evolving, but on balance of best evidence we should 1) bypass NICU and have the baby ‘room in’ with mother as the default strategy and 2) avoid the use of the Finnegan scoring system. Based on our 17 year experience with approximately 1,500 infants here in Vancouver, everyone will be happier!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.026
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0100.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207