MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2817292848

Mining Indaba '16: : We've yet to hit rock bottom, says Baker & McKenzie

2016· article· en· W2817292848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Industrial Minerals

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTonnePotashnobodyAgricultural economicsConsumption (sociology)CommerceCommodityEconomicsSupply and demandEconomic shortageCompetitor analysisNatural resource economicsEconomyBusinessEngineeringMarket economyMicroeconomicsWaste managementManagementChemistryArtComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nobody wants to be the one who gives ground, as that may be letting their competitors in, one attendee at this year's Mining Indaba told IM. The problem is, this strategy means running a company into the ground before giving up, to a point where nobody will want to buy or revive it in the future. Since then, prices have not rebounded to more than $300/tonne. prices have not recovered to reach the $400/tonne mark (FOB Vancouver), [Smith] said. But at $240/tonne, believe that the market had bottomed out. Potash is an elastic commodity and consumption is sensitive to price. In general, for every $50/tonne increase in potash prices, we see demand decline by 1.1m tonnes. Overall, growth in potash demand is expected to be moderate compared to supply, Smith said. I expect consumption to reach 56.9m tonnes by 2020, leaving the market with an overall higher surplus than currently. In an oversupplied market, only those producers that have long-term supply agreements in place are expected to be successful, Smith said.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207