The Role of Motivation in Secondary Mathematics Instruction: Implications for RTI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Response to Intervention--what do we know about it, why does it work, and how can teachers use it to ensure high-quality K-12 math instruction? Find out in this definitive research volume, edited by National Math Panel veteran Russell Gersten with contributions by all of the country's leading researchers on RTI and math. Current and future RTI coordinator's curriculum developers, math specialists, and department heads will get the best, most up-to-date research and guidance on key facets of RTI in math: conducting valid and reliable universal screening in mathematics; using evidence-based practices to provide a strong general education curriculum for effective Tier 1 instruction; implementing explicit, research-based teaching practices for students who need Tier 2 and 3 instruction; monitoring students' progress with high-quality tools and measures; motivating and engaging struggling students receiving Tier 2 and 3 instruction; teaching students to use an array of visual representations to help them solve math problems; tailoring RTI for every grade level, from kindergarten through high school; and using RTI to target specific mathematical proficiencies and concepts, such as number sense, word problems, algebra, and ratios and proportions. Filled with vignettes, accessible summaries of research studies, and best-practice guidelines for making the most of RTI, this comprehensive volume is ideal for use as a textbook or as a key resource to guide both practitioners and decision makers. Readers will have the knowledge base they need to strengthen mathematics instruction with proven RTI practices--and help ensure better math outcomes for students at every grade level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it