MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Freeze‐dried strawberry powder lowers total cholesterol and LDL‐cholesterol in females with abdominal adiposity and dyslipidemia

2009· article· en· W28220378 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marci Wilkinson, Brandi N. Simmons, Nancy M. Betts, Arpita Basu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Healthcare Engineering Society
KeywordsDyslipidemiaWaistMedicineInternal medicineCholesterolLipid profileFood scienceEndocrinologyAnthropometryTotal cholesterolAnimal scienceChemistryObesityBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strawberry flavonoids are potent antioxidants and anti‐inflammatory agents and have been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality in prospective studies. In this feeding study we tested the hypothesis that freeze‐dried strawberry powder (FSP) will lower fasting lipids and biomarkers of oxidative stress compared to baseline. Females (n=16) with abdominal adiposity (BMI = 30, waist circumference >35 inches) and elevated lipids (total cholesterol >200 mg/dL, or triglycerides > 150mg/dL) or low high‐density lipoproteins (HDL <50mg/dL) were fed 2 cups of the strawberry drink daily. Each cup had 25g of FSP blended in water. Subjects made 3 days/week visits for 4 weeks. Fasting blood draws, anthropometrics and blood pressure measurements were done at baseline and 4 weeks. FSP significantly reduced total cholesterol and low‐density lipoproteins (LDL)‐cholesterol levels at 4 weeks versus baseline {195.25±6.23mg/dL vs. 205.56±7.18 mg/dL (p=0.017), and 114.93±4.83 mg/dL vs. 124.27±6.37 mg/dL (p= 0.038), respectively}. Oxidized‐LDL showed a decreasing trend at 4 weeks (p=0.123). Thus, freeze‐dried strawberry powder exerts hypocholesterolemic effects and lowers CVD risk factors in obese women. (Funded by CHES, OSU)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases→French-language works237,207→