MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2828136093 · doi:10.1520/gtj20170192

Effect of Filling Humidity on the Propagation of High-Amplitude Stress Waves through an Artificial Joint

2018· article· en· W2828136093 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfillGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceJoint (building)Split-Hopkinson pressure barCompactionAmplitudeStiffnessStress (linguistics)GeologyComposite materialStructural engineeringEngineeringOpticsStrain rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The purpose of this article is to further investigate the seismic response of an artificial filled joint under high-amplitude stress waves considering the effect of filling humidity, following our earlier work on dry infill. A steel split Hopkinson pressure bar system is utilized to induce high-amplitude stress waves to the filled joint. In this study, the wet infill is a mixture composed of quartz sand, kaolinite clay, and water. It is found that when the water content is relatively low, i.e., 8.25 %, the seismic response of the joint with wet infill is similar to that of the joint with dry infill, as shown in the literature. When the stress wave amplitude increases, the infill is progressively compacted and the transmission coefficient increases. However, there exists a crushing deformation stage for the infill in which many particles are crushed, and the transmission coefficient decreases as the incident wave amplitude increases. The water in the infill can reduce the friction between grains, which may lead to the decrease of the joint stiffness. As a result, the transmission coefficient is smaller than the case with dry infill under similar loading conditions. When the water content is moderate, such as 16.75 %, particles are very difficult to crush and the infill dominantly experiences compaction even when loaded by very high-amplitude stress waves. Consequently, the transmission coefficient through the wet infill always increases with the increase of the incident wave amplitude. When the infill is fully saturated (water content = 25.0 %), it can only experience approximately elastic deformation, and few particles can be crushed. In this case, the transmission coefficient is independent of the incident wave amplitude. When the infill is dry or fully saturated, the transmission coefficient is insensitive to the amplitude of the incident wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it