MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2832150109 · doi:10.1101/365270

Effect of <i>PPARGC1A</i> Gly428Ser (rs8192678) polymorphism on athletic sports performance: A meta-analysis

2018· preprint· en· W2832150109 on OpenAlex
Phuntila Tharabenjasin, Noel Pabalan, Hamdi Jarjanazi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Physical Performance
Canadian institutionsMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfidence intervalMeta-analysisHomogeneousOdds ratioMedicineInternal medicineDemographyPolymorphism (computer science)AlleleGeneticsMathematicsBiologyGeneCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Genetics plays a role in sports performance (SP) which, in this study, is measured by power and endurance activities as well as a mix between the two. However, variable results from genetic association studies warrant a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates of the association between PPARGC1A Gly482Ser polymorphism and SP. Methods Multi-database literature search yielded 14 articles (16 studies) for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used in estimating associations. Summary effects were modified based on statistical power. Subgroups were SP (power, endurance and mixed) and race (Caucasians and Asians). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 metric and its sources examined with outlier analysis. Results Gly allele effects significantly favoring SP (OR &gt; 1.0, P &lt; 0.05) form the core of our findings in: (i) the homogeneous overall effect at the post-modified, post-outlier level (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.01, I 2 = 0%); (ii) initially homogeneous power SP (ORs 1.22-1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.44, P = 0.003-0.008, I 2 = 0%) which precluded outlier treatment; (iii) pre-outlier Caucasian outcomes (ORs 1.29-1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.54, P = 0.0005) over that of Asians with a pooled null effect (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.72-1.99, P = 0.53-0.92); (iv) homogeneous all &gt; 80% (ORs 1.19-1.38, 95% CI 1.05-1.66, P = 0.0007-0.007, I 2 = 0%) on account of high statistical power (both study-specific and combined). In contrast, none of the Ser allele effects significantly favored SP and no Ser-Gly genotype outcome favored SP. The core significant outcomes were robust and comparisons subjected to publication bias test showed no evidence of it. Conclusion Lines of evidence show that the Gly allele effects favor SP. These were observed in the overall, Caucasians and statistically powered comparisons which exhibited consistent significance, stability, robustness, precision and lack of bias, all of which provide good evidence of associations between the Gly allele and SP. List of abbreviations A Asian ACE Angiotensin converting enzyme ACTN3 Alpha (α)-actinin 3 AM Analysis model ANOVA Analysis of variance df Degree of freedom ES Elevated significance C Caucasian CB Clark-Baudouin CI Confidence interval CID Confidence interval difference E Endurance EH Eliminated heterogeneity F Fixed-effects Fs Favoring SP Ds Disfavoring SP Gly Glycine GS Gain in significance Het Heterogeneity HWE Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium I 2 Measure of variability expressed in % K Number designation of the study Li Lithuania Log OR Logarithm of OR M Mixed maf Minor allele frequency M-H Mantel-Haenszel

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it