MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2833869080 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-11022

The Eole of LRRK2 G2019S Mutation in Neuroinflammatory Processes and Its Relevance for Parkinson's Disease

2015· dissertation· en· W2833869080 on OpenAlexaff
Zachary Dwyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLRRK2Parkinson's diseaseMutantLipopolysaccharideMutationNeuroinflammationDiseaseDopamineBiologyMedicineImmunologyInflammationNeuroscienceGeneticsInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pa ki so s disease (PD) has been linked to a variety of environmental and immunological challenges involving both oxidative and inflammatory processes, however, genetics also clearly plays a role in vulnerability to such insults.Indeed, the Gly-2019-Ser (G2019S) leucine rich repeat kinase (LRRK2) mutation is the most common mutation enriched compared to controls in both familial and sporadic Pa ki so s patie ts.Our current study focuses on the interplay between the G2019S genetic mutation and exposure to the bacterial endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS).In the current study mice were centrally infused with either vehicle or one of two doses of LPS (2 or 10ug) in order to determine whether an inflammatory based insult would produce augmented pathology in G2019S mutant mice.Infusion of LPS into the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc; the region containing dopamine neurons which degenerate in PD) produced a (non-statistically significant) trend towards a dose-dependent reduction in SNc dopamine neurons in both G2019S mutants and their wild type littermates.Although few motor deficits were apparent (likely a reflection of the modest changes in dopamine neurons), the G2019S mutants did display a basal difference in gait.As would be expected, LPS infusion also induced marked sickness behaviour along with weight loss; however, G2019S mutant mice showed a slower recovery of weight days following the infusion.Interestingly, the lower of the two LPS doses (2 µg) increased microglial activation and this effect was only apparent in the G2019S mutant mice.Overall, the present results do not support a major impact of G2019S LRRK2 mutation in increasing vulnerability to the neurodegenerative or motor effects of the immunogenic insult, LPS.That said, LRRK2 G2019S mice might have increased vulnerability to non-motor co-morbid or pro-inflammatory effects of immune challenges along with displaying subtle basal motor deficits.iii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→