The privilege of knowing better: Female millennial demographics and the representation of homophobia on teen TV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The 2010–11 seasons of 90210 (2008–13), Degrassi (2010–15), Glee (2009–15) and Pretty Little Liars (2010–17) represent homophobia as arising from closeted teens, cisgender male ‘jocks’, racialized characters and immigrants. Rather than locating homophobia and heteronormativity within the social fabric and minds of all who have been steeped in American and Canadian hegemonic beliefs, homophobic characters are framed as rare, anachronistic and out-of-step with the seemingly post-homophobia ethos they exist within. Drawing on media trade publications, I place these patterns for representing homophobia in their market context, arguing that profit motives encourage representations of gay teens and homophobia that suggest homophobic beliefs are the domain of ‘others’, apart from the privileged viewer of teen TV: affluent, educated, female, white and non-white millennials aged 18–34. The target viewers are invited to see themselves as innocent and enlightened in relation to homophobic others, while prescribing a cure to homophobia that emphasizes individual change over social change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".