Functional genetic discovery of enzymes using full-scan mass spectrometry metabolomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our understanding of metabolic networks is incomplete, and new enzymatic activities await discovery in well-studied organisms. Mass spectrometric measurement of cellular metabolites reveals compounds inside cells that are unexplained by current maps of metabolic reactions, and existing computational models are unable to account for all activities observed within cells. Additional large-scale genetic and biochemical approaches are required to elucidate metabolic gene function. We have used full-scan mass spectrometry metabolomics of polar small molecules to examine deletion mutants of candidate enzymes in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We report the identification of 25 genes whose deletion results in focal metabolic changes consistent with loss of enzymatic activity and describe the informatic approaches used to enrich for candidate enzymes from uncharacterized open reading frames. Triumphs and pitfalls of metabolic phenotyping screens are discussed, including estimates of the frequency of uncharacterized eukaryotic genes that affect metabolism and key issues to consider when searching for new enzymatic functions in other organisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".